Bencher Voter Guide
Photo of Saqib Javaid

Saqib Javaid

District
Edmonton
Organization
SJS Law
Location
Edmonton
Call year
2018

Positions

Position summaries interpret each candidate's statements. They aren't the candidates' own words and haven't been endorsed by them. How positions are assessed

Not stated: The statement does not provide enough topic-specific evidence. It does not mean opposition or lack of relevant experience.

AI

AI and the Practice of Law

Calls for evidence-based consideration of both the benefits and risks of AI and technology, including confidentiality and duties to the public, with input from lawyers and the public.

Explicit
  • AI risks and regulation
Evidence and limits

Explicit · Policy principle. A relevant principle, priority, issue recognition or reported practice is directly expressed. This does not necessarily mean a specific policy change is proposed.

Effective regulation also requires an understanding of how technology, including artificial intelligence, affects client confidentiality and the duties lawyers owe to the public. These tools offer benefits and present risks, and both call for careful, evidencebased consideration with input from members and the public.

The statement explicitly identifies AI, its competing benefits and risks, and the process for considering them.

What this doesn't show

  • No specific AI use is endorsed or prohibited.
Read the full statement
Compare on AI

Regulatory Burden

Regulatory Burden on Solo and Small Firm

Supports fair, transparent and proportionate regulation informed by firms of every size, expressly recognizing the cost and effort of trust accounting, audits, insurance and compliance without a large back office.

Explicit
  • Compliance cost and administration
  • Proportionate regulation
  • Practice realities in regulation
Evidence and limits

Explicit · Policy principle, Issue recognition. A relevant principle, priority, issue recognition or reported practice is directly expressed. This does not necessarily mean a specific policy change is proposed.

I manage trust accounting, audits, insurance, billing and compliance myself, without a large back office. That daily experience has given me a practical understanding of the responsibilities lawyers carry for client funds, client confidentiality and risk, and of the cost and effort of meeting them in an independent practice.
Effective regulation requires sound judgment, fairness, transparency and proportionality. It requires an understanding of the practical realities faced by lawyers in firms of every size, and by the clients and members of the public who rely on them.

The statement expressly joins a proportionality principle, firm-size differences and the practical compliance burden of an independent practice.

What this doesn't show

  • No specific obligation is proposed for removal, and no reduction in public protection is advocated.
Read the full statement
Compare on Regulatory Burden

A2J

Access to Justice through Allied Professionals

Not stated.

Compare on A2J

Candidate statement

As published on the candidate's Law Society of Alberta election profile.

I am seeking election as a Bencher of the Law Society of Alberta with 26 years of experience in law and public service, in regulation, prosecution, rule-making and now private practice. I understand the responsibilities that come with membership in a self-regulating profession, and the Society’s purposes under section 2.1 of the Legal Profession Act: ensuring the integrity, competence and ethical conduct of lawyers, regulating the practice of law, and supporting and assisting lawyers in serving the public.

In Pakistan, I served as District Attorney, District Public Prosecutor, Under Secretary in the Law and Parliamentary Affairs Department and Additional Secretary in the Home Affairs Department of the Government of Balochistan, and sat on committees of several ministries. That work included prosecution, drafting and vetting legislation and rules, and public policy, where decisions had to be fair, proportionate and explained.

Since 2019 I have practised in Edmonton as principal of SJS Law, in real estate, corporate, and wills and estates law. I manage trust accounting, audits, insurance, billing and compliance myself, without a large back office. That daily experience has given me a practical understanding of the responsibilities lawyers carry for client funds, client confidentiality and risk, and of the cost and effort of meeting them in an independent practice.

Effective regulation requires sound judgment, fairness, transparency and proportionality. It requires an understanding of the practical realities faced by lawyers in firms of every size, and by the clients and members of the public who rely on them. It also requires listening carefully, considering differing perspectives, and deciding objectively on the evidence and in the public interest. Effective regulation also requires an understanding of how technology, including artificial intelligence, affects client confidentiality and the duties lawyers owe to the public. These tools offer benefits and present risks, and both call for careful, evidencebased consideration with input from members and the public.

In public service and in practice, I have learned that trust in a regulator is earned through openness, timeliness and reasoned decisions made in the public interest.

A Bencher’s duty is to the public interest in the administration of justice, not to any group of lawyers. I would approach the role with independence, diligence and an open mind, and would be honoured to contribute my experience to the Society’s work of protecting the public and maintaining public confidence in the administration of justice.